• BACKGROUND
    • Lyme arthritis often presents as acute monoarticular arthritis challenging to distinguish from septic arthritis. Typical management for Lyme arthritis entails antibiotic therapy, while septic arthritis usually warrants operative debridement. During the period when Western Pennsylvania transitioned to a Lyme-endemic region, many children underwent operative intervention who were ultimately diagnosed with Lyme arthritis due to diagnostic ambiguity. We examined the impact of the operative intervention on pediatric Lyme arthritis outcomes.
  • METHODS
    • We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a tertiary care children's hospital who were diagnosed with Lyme arthritis from 2008 to 2018 using chart review. Inclusion criteria were positive Lyme serology by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition, clinical arthritis, and negative bacterial cultures. We recorded clinical presentation, laboratory data, details of hospitalization, costs, and outcomes after therapy to compare the impact of antibiotics alone (nonoperative group) versus antibiotics plus operative debridement (operative group).
  • RESULTS
    • A total of 149 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 47 (32%) patients underwent orthopaedic intervention. Operative management was associated with increased length (3.17 vs. 1.40 d) and cost ($27,850 vs. $10,716) of admission. The clinical resolution was documented in 57/58 patients (98%) in the nonoperative group and 41/42 patients (98%) in the operative group. The median duration to resolution was 21 days for both groups.
  • CONCLUSIONS
    • Operative management of pediatric patients with Lyme arthritis is associated with increased resource utilization and costs while being similarly efficacious to nonoperative management. As the US Lyme epidemic expands, improved diagnosis and management of acute undifferentiated arthritis may prevent unneeded operative intervention.
  • LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
    • Level III-retrospective cohort study.