• BACKGROUND
    • Acute Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury and when missed leads to the development of a chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Studies suggest surgical treatment (either repair or reconstruction) for most patients with a chronic Achilles rupture due to the functional deficit caused by the lack of an intact Achilles tendon. Numerous autograft options such as the flexor hallucis longus, hamstrings, peroneal and quadriceps tendon have been used to reconstruct the Achilles tendon, either as a tendon transfer or as an interposition graft. The choice of autograft used usually depends on the size of the defect left after debridement of the Achilles tendon edges, but is often dictated by surgeon preference and tissue availability. Currently, there is no consensus as to the best autograft option.
  • AIMS AND METHODOLOGY
    • The aim of this study was to evaluate the various autograft options used to reconstruct the Achilles tendon, and the advantages and disadvantages of using each tendon, focussing specifically on the harvesting technique, anatomical and biomechanical properties. This was done by reviewing the current published literature, supplemented by carrying out anatomical dissection in the cadaveric lab.
  • RESULTS
    • The flexor hallucis longus is synergistically related to the Achilles tendon and biomechanically strong, however harvesting can result in weakness in big toe flexion. The peroneus brevis whilst being biomechanically strong is a much shorter tendon compared to the other autograft options. Similarly, the quadriceps tendon is also a strong tendon option, but may not be appropriate for larger chronic Achilles tendon rupture gaps. The semitendinosus tendon can be tripled/quadrupled to resemble the Achilles tendon, but is associated with higher risks of patient morbidity when harvesting the tendon.
  • CONCLUSION
    • Treatment of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures remains a challenge. Each autograft option has its own unique advantages and disadvantages which should be considered on a case-specific basis. Further work is required to analyse the biomechanical properties of the autograft options to determine if one option is superior.