Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Images
  • Summary
  • Epidemiology
  • Etiology
  • Anatomy
  • Classification
  • Presentation
  • Imaging
  • Treatment
    • Nonoperative
      • immobilization for 3-7 days followed by early ROM
        • indications
          • Mason Type I - isolated minimally displaced fractures with no mechanical blocks
          • Mason Type II without mechanical block
        • outcomes
          • good results in 85% to 95% of patients
          • beware elbow stiffness with prolonged immobilization
    • Operative
      • ORIF (open reduction internal fixation)
        • indications
          • Mason Type II with mechanical block
          • Mason Type III/IV where ORIF feasible
          • presence of other complex ipsilateral elbow injuries
          • open fracture
        • techniques
          • screw(s) only
          • plate + screw(s)
        • outcomes
          • >90% good-excellent outcomes in Mason II fractures, with variable outcomes in Mason III fractures
          • # fragments
            • ORIF shown to have worse outcome when more than 3 fragments present compared to ORIF with 3 or less fragments
              • >50% rate of unsatisfactory outcomes after ORIF with > 3 fragments
          • isolated vs. complex
            • ORIF isolated radial head fractures versus complex radial head fractures (other associated fracture/dislocation) show no significant difference in outcomes at 4 years
            • isolated fractures trended towards better Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation score, lower complication rate and lower rate of secondary capsular release
            • fixation associated with higher failure rate than radial head arthroplasty if there is elbow instability
      • fragment excision
        • indications
          • older, lower-demand adults with complex fractures but no associated instability
          • fragments less than 25% of the surface area of the radial head or 25%-33% of capitellar surface area
        • outcomes
          • even small fragment excision may lead to instability
      • radial head resection
        • indications
          • not commonly performed due to radial head role in elbow stabilization
          • low demand, sedentary patients
          • in a delayed setting for continued pain of an isolated radial head fracture
          • salvage procedure
        • contraindications
          • presence of destabilizing injuries
            • forearm interosseous ligament injury (>3mm translation with radius pull test)
            • coronoid fracture
            • MCL deficiency
        • outcomes
          • may lead to increased carrying angle and proximal radial migration
            • associated with pain at elbow and wrist due to ulnar impaction
          • worse outcomes with regards to strength, function and motion compared to ORIF
          • higher percentage of arthritis (73%) compared to contralateral uninjured elbow after excision
      • radial head arthroplasty
        • indications
          • comminuted fractures (Mason Type III) with more than 3 fragments 
          • severe plastic deformity of radial head
          • nonunion/malunion
          • elbow fracture-dislocations 
            • terrible triad or Monteggia variants
            • with involvement of >30% of articular surface of radial head
          • Essex-Lopresti lesions
            • radial head excision will exacerbate elbow/wrist instability and may result in proximal radial migration and ulnocarpal impingement
        • outcomes
          • radial head fractures requiring replacement have shown good clinical outcomes with metallic implants
          • compared to ORIF for fracture-dislocations and Mason Type III fractures, arthroplasty results in greater stability, lower complication rate and higher patient satisfaction
      • intramedullary nail fixation
        • indications
          • not yet considered mainstream treatment as it is in the pediatric population
        • technique
          • retrograde titanium nail reduction and stabilization
        • outcomes
          • small powered case studies show good outcomes
  • Techniques
  • Complications
Card
1 of 127

Congratulations!
All cards in this set are done

Question
1 of 33
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Private Note

Add Colleague
Lab Values
Calculator